Asumang, Annang2022-10-042022-10-04https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14194/2892The book of Esther, and more specifically the amount of information on vengeance that occurs in it, has both intrigued and been criticised by several scholars. Haman plans to inflict vengeance on Mordecai and all Jews in the Empire. When his plot fails, Esther, Mordecai, and all the Jewish people engage in new revenge against all their enemy forces, including Haman. Central to all these is the role of King Ahasuerus. The King initiates and signs the edicts that effect vengeance, and this cannot be ignored in the assessment of the motif. From the above perspective, some scholars have criticised the role King Ahasuerus played in Esther's narrative. It has been viewed as problematic, especially the scale of vengeance that flows in the book of Esther. King Ahasuerus's leadership indeed failed to prevent the spiral of violence in the Empire. This motif of vengeance in the book of Esther has therefore remained captivating and the centre of much controversy. To solve the main problem, I attempt to examine vengeance in a literary and theological manner. The versatile flexibility of using this approach allowed me to address the complex research problem under investigation in this thesis. Its plot development and the critical role of King Ahasuerus as it relates to revenge are analysed. However, from the theological point of view, it is noted that the likely theocentric narrator is obliged to contrast the conduct of Ahasuerus as pagan king with Yahweh's role as the avenger of his people. Accordingly, I have been motivated to see and demonstrate how the literary device of vengeance became a tool to show God's providential care to protect Jewish people in the Empire. God's actions behind the scenes reveal a profound truth about his active presence in the history of the life of his people.300Esther (Biblical Book)VengeanceThesis