Interpreting Parables: One Point or Many (Conspectus Volume 10 September 2010)
dc.contributor.editor | Erdey, Zoltan L. | |
dc.date | 2010 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-04T10:31:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-04T10:31:04Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Abstract Two modes of parable interpretation have dominated much of church history. The first and most dominant was allegorization, in which each element in the parable narrative was contrasted with a real lifereferent, thought to communicate an enigmatic or spiritual truth. In contrast to the allegorical exegetical method is the single-lesson interpretive model, which advocates that parables teach a single lesson. None of these interpretive models are adequate, for they either oversimplifying or unnecessarily allegorising the parables of Jesus. The model recommended by Blomberg, which views the parables as teaching one, two, or three lessons, contingent on the number of main characters in the parables, avoids the pitfalls on the two extremes, and ought to be adopted as the standard evangelical mode | |
dc.identifier | https://share.sats.edu.za/share/s/NVwh10q6R5amPdwdr-V9Gw | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14194/2897 | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | South African Theological Seminary Press Johannesburg, South Africa | |
dc.subject | Theology, Doctrinal | |
dc.title | Interpreting Parables: One Point or Many (Conspectus Volume 10 September 2010) | |
dc.type | Article |